> On May 20, 2022, at 1:15 AM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022, at 06:39, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
>> This does not align with the definition of MAY in RFC 2119.
>> I suggest:
>>
>> Advertising the grease_quic_bit transport parameter indicates that
>> packets sent to this endpoint will be accepted with a value of 0 for
>> the QUIC Bit.
>
> I've made a larger change so that things aren't quite so backward:
>
> +An endpoint that advertises the grease_quic_bit transport parameter MUST
> accept
> +packets with the QUIC Bit set to a value of 0.
>
> I've made the other changes in
> https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/25
Even better than the text that I proposed. Thanks.
