On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:13:24 +1100, Martin Thomson wrote: > I see this in the draft: > > "TBD - experiments use 0xadda" > > I find it hard to believe that this value was chosen at random. > Please consult a random number generator for these values. And - > while you are developing proposals - larger values might be more > appropriate.
That was a pretty nitpicky comment... Have you read draft-ietf-quic-multipath? The 0xbabaXX constants don't look very random if you consider the affiliation of the first authors. Also, what is a "large" value? 0xadda is big enough to require a 32-bit VarInt. /me
