Agreed!

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:02 AM Christian Huitema <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, looks good. The revised text corresponds to the "natural" behavior.
>
> -- Christian Huitema
>
> On 3/1/2023 10:56 AM, Nick Banks wrote:
> > I’m fine with the updated text as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Nick
> >
> > Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> >
> > *From:* QUIC <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * David Schinazi
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2023 1:56 PM
> > *To:* Martin Duke <[email protected]>
> > *Cc:* IETF QUIC WG <[email protected]>
> > *Subject:* Re: Additional clarification for QUICv2
> >
> > LGTM.
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:46 AM Martin Duke <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello all,
> >
> >     I'm going through the final step for publishing RFC9369 (QUICv2)
> >     [https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9369.html
> >     <
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9369.html&data=05%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7Cf28614473a054cbd5c0608db1a869f29%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638132937734727936%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=j7wdum%2Fx8RyY0fB1JhfWQR%2BDg9hUDqn%2FKCQ1QcwP480%3D&reserved=0>]
> and my reading of it finds something that is just the tiniest bit ambiguous.
> >
> >     In Section 5:
> >
> >     Clients MUST NOT use a session ticket or token from a QUIC version 1
> >     connection to initiate a QUIC version 2 connection, and vice versa.
> >
> >     My intent was that in the following sequence:
> >
> >     - Client sends initial with v1;
> >
> >     - Server replies with v2 (compatible VN)
> >
> >     - Server sends resumption and NEW_TOKEN tokens
> >
> >     that those tokens are considered to be v2 tokens, so they can only
> >     be used if the subsequent connection with the client has a v2
> Initial.
> >
> >     Does anyone disagree with that interpretation? I'd like to change
> >     the first paragraph of Section 5 as follows:
> >
> >     OLD:
> >
> >     TLS session tickets and NEW_TOKEN tokens are specific to the QUIC
> >     version of the connection that provided them. Clients MUST NOT use a
> >     session ticket or token from a QUIC version 1 connection to initiate
> >     a QUIC version 2 connection, and vice versa.
> >
> >     NEW:
> >
> >     TLS session tickets and NEW_TOKEN tokens are specific to the QUIC
> >     version of the connection that provided them. Clients MUST NOT use a
> >     session ticket or token from a QUIC version 1 connection to initiate
> >     a QUIC version 2 connection, and vice versa. When a connection
> >     includes compatible version negotiation, any server tokens are
> >     considered to originate from the negotiated version, not the
> >     original one.
> >
> >     Martin
> >
>
>

Reply via email to