On Fri, Oct 13, 2023, at 11:11, Kazuho Oku wrote: > 2023年10月11日(水) 10:07 Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net>: >> I'm more concerned about adding another negotiation point for the request. >> If they progress in parallel, then we need separate negotiation for each and >> that gets tricky when there is an interdependency like this. > > If that is the main concern, I think we might consider changing the > Transport Parameter used for negotiating Reliable Reset to take a > version number.
I'm not enthusiastic about adding extra extension points like that. My sense is that either ENOUGH is worth doing or not, and that won't change much in future. If the protocol needs to get much more complex in order to support it, then it will be less worthwhile.
