(no hats on) What Nick says matches my understanding. Nicholas, could you elaborate why you're asking? I.e. are you curious _why_ QUIC mandates TLS 1.3, instead of something else, or leaving open the door more explicitly for something else?
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:25 AM Nick Harper <i...@nharper.org> wrote: > > That discussion would've happened during the WG formation. That QUIC uses TLS > has been in the WG charter since the first draft that I see on the > datatracker, and the original approved charter calls out a key goal of > "Providing always-secure transport, using TLS 1.3 by default." > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:12 AM Nicholas Warren <nwar...@barryelectric.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello quic wg. >> >> >> >> I am curious about how quic seemingly mandates usage of TLS (rfc9000 section >> 5); albeit I have not completely read quic-tls. >> >> >> >> Does anyone remember when you all discussed this? I was hoping to go back >> and read the archived list from when the discussion had taken place. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nich Warren
