> On 26. Aug 2024, at 22:46, Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks to everyone who's provided feedback! I hope to publish draft-01 soon.
> 
>  I have a strange question: does it ever make any sense to bind or connect to 
> an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address (i.e. ::ffff:<Ipv4_address>)? I've been 
> experimenting with this, and the results are
Sure. You are using a single AF_INET6 socket, but connect to an IPv4 address. 
That is a valid
use case.

Best regards
Michael
> sometimes goofy for each platform. Is this even worth addressing in the 
> draft, or is it too silly of a use case?
> 
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:39 PM Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi TSVWG and QUIC,
> 
> I've made it some of the way through implementing receive ECN for Chromium, 
> which involved quite a bit of trial and error in figuring out the quirks of 
> the Apple and Windows UDP socket APIs.
> 
> This is an informational draft that tries to capture some of that learning, 
> since hopefully more QUIC implementations will add ECN support across 
> multiple platforms.
> 
> Obviously, this is a work in progress. People that have worked with other 
> OSes, or that can see into the kernel code and update/correct/refute some of 
> my statements here, are welcome to contribute.
> 
> My guess is that it fits into TSVWG, although it is mostly of relevance to 
> QUIC folks. If people are really interested in it, we could adopt it TSVWG. 
> If not, at least there's a record somewhere so that others don't have to 
> suffer as I did.
> 
> Martin
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:33 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt
> To: Martin Duke <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Martin Duke and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:     draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn
> Revision: 00
> Title:    Configuring UDP Sockets for ECN for Common Platforms
> Date:     2024-08-23
> Group:    Individual Submission
> Pages:    9
> URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn-00.txt
> Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn/
> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn
> 
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>    Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) applies to all transport
>    protocols in principle.  However, it had limited applications for UDP
>    until QUIC became widely deployed.  As a result, documentation of UDP
>    socket APIs for ECN on various platforms is sparse.  This document
>    records the results of experimenting with these APIs in order to get
>    ECN working on UDP for Chromium on Apple, Linux, and Windows
>    platforms.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 

Reply via email to