The following errata report has been verified for RFC9000,
"QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8240

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2025-01-06
Verified by: Zaheduzzaman Sarker (IESG)

Section: 12.4

Original Text
-------------
0x1c-0x1d   CONNECTION_CLOSE  Section 19.19  ih01  N

Corrected Text
--------------
0x1c-0x1d   CONNECTION_CLOSE  Section 19.19  ih01  NC

Notes
-----
QUIC congestion control RFC 9002 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9002) 
section 3 states:

"The types of frames contained in a packet affect recovery and congestion 
control logic:
...
Packets containing frames besides ACK or CONNECTION_CLOSE frames count toward 
congestion control limits and are considered to be in flight."

So as per RFC-9002, it means that ACK and CONNECTION_CLOSE frames do not 
contribute to congestion control limits.

On the other hand, RFC-9000, section 12.4 has a Table 3 
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000#frame-types) which states:

"The "Spec" column in Table 3 summarizes any special rules governing the 
processing or generation of the frame type, as indicated by the following 
characters:
...
C: Packets containing only frames with this marking do not count toward bytes 
in flight for congestion control purposes; see [QUIC-RECOVERY]."

However, in that table, the CONNECTION_CLOSE frame isn't marked with the "C" 
character and only the ACK frame is. This appears to be an oversight in that 
table in RFC-9000.


See related discussions here ( 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/M3j4UsFxXPS6A8EX1d2zW_ZQrMQ/ )


--------------------------------------
RFC9000 (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34)
--------------------------------------
Title               : QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : J. Iyengar, Ed., M. Thomson, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : QUIC
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

Reply via email to