Hi, On Mar 27, 2025, at 06:19, Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin,
not Martin, but that won't stop me from responding :-) > Do you have any opinion on whether the evolution of the text in RFC 9000 > would best be done in the form of a 9000bis, or as text in a new document > (that updates RFC 9000), or some other approach? I'd hesitate to open up 9000bis for this, unless we have a host of other fixes/changes we want to make to 9000. A separate new doc that updates 9000 seems like a lighter-weight approach. Thanks, Lars
