I’ve done a review pass on the latest version of the document. In general, I think it looks good! I did have some editorial comments that I covered in this issue: https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/544. None of them are major, but I think there are some points that would help with clarity and readability.
Thanks, Tommy > On Apr 24, 2025, at 5:16 PM, Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > This email announces the WGLC for the Multipath Extension for QUIC draft [1]. > This document has seen significant work and thanks to persistent effort of > the authors and other contributors the design and editorial content has > stabilized. There are multiple interoperating implementations and there is > rough consensus on the protocol design. > > The chairs and authors believe the document is ready for WGLC. This is a > sizeable document and in order to give sufficient review time, the WGLC will > run for 4 weeks, concluding at end of day 2025-05-23 Anywhere on Earth [2]. > > Please file issues on Github [3], or alternatively raise them on the list. As > a reminder, GitHub Pull Requests are not the appropriate place for lengthy > discussion or litigation of elements outside the scope of the PR. The chairs > request participants open specific and actionable issues, in order to keep PR > comments focused on refinement of proposed text changes. > > Cheers > Lucas & Matt > QUIC WG Chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/14/ > [2] https://www.timeanddate.com/time/zones/aoe > [3] https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues > > > >
