Hiya,
On 29/05/2025 02:24, David Schinazi wrote:
Both have value, though on different axes. (1) provides user privacy (though roughly zero of that, see below) whereas (2) can help reduce ECH blockage if sufficient client deployments of ECH enable GREASE ECH. In practice, as MT points out, implementations are already fingerprintable using a bunch of other details, such as initial DCID length. So the benefit to (1) is limited.
I'd not think being able to fingerprint an implementation implies a total loss of user privacy, which is how I read the above. What am I missing? Ta, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
