Hi, These minutes are great, thanks! Seems like it was an interesting conversation.
I would like to speak to one element of them: >> All the experiments seem to be run on network intensive applications. But >> when looking people developing applications, they mostly don’t care. Just >> use whatever the language provides. Need better tools in programming >> languages to make it easier to use QUIC. FWIW, this is why the TAPS WG existed, see RFCs 9621, 9622, 9623. It would be great if we could get some momentum towards more implementations, specifically ones that use QUIC… surely there’s no easier way for people to access QUIC’s features without having to care about the specifics. I currently have two master students working on implementations that will use QUIC, but that’s as much as *I* can offer, from the world of academia. Cheers, Michael PS: there’s also https://github.com/tfpauly/draft-taps-quic-mapping but it’s going stale…
