Hi Roman, Yes, based on the IANA request, we already have an PR for this:
https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/635/changes Mirja On 05.02.26, 16:31, "Roman Danyliw via Datatracker" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-quic-multipath-19: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-multipath/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- IANA needs to be instructed to remove, deprecate, or obsolete QUIC Transport Parameters enable_multipath provisional and enable_multipath(-06), QUIC Frame Type PATH_STATUS, and QUIC Transport Error Code MP_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Meral Shirazipour for the GENART review.
