Hey folks! I just proposed my branch for merging.
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/quickly/extras/+merge/107104
<https://code.launchpad.net/%7Emterry/quickly/extras/+merge/107104>
I'd appreciate a code review by Tony or Didier so I can get this into
trunk and then into an SRU. Also testing by folks in general would be good.
Now, this branch is focused exclusively on non-invasive changes to help
with the SRU process. Specifically, that meant I only wanted to make
changes to the --extras code path. So we add a lot of lines to
debian/rules that could have been better done via upgrade.py changes to
the user's code.
For 12.10, I think a follow-on goal to this branch is to stop polluting
debian/rules and make the user's code more capable of being run from
either /opt or /usr.
(Also note that this branch drops some old stuff we did for the ARB like
the metadata in debian/control. Allison says it is no longer required
as the MyApps portal does it for us.)
-mt
On 23/05/12 15:41, Michael Terry wrote:
Sorry, I'm just now catching up to post-UDS quickly work. I've
started a branch to fix the --extras command to match what the ARB wants.
Thanks everyone for helping to fix these bugs. I'm sad we shipped
12.04 with them! Part of the problem was that we didn't have good
test coverage of extras. My branch adds a new test for it. It's not
done yet, but it's close.
https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/quickly/extras
-mt
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quickly-talk
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
