On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 11:30 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Monday 02 May 2005 22:09, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > > > > > > Well, I can't because it's not tagged yet and tags are mandatory to my > > > script... > > > > Hm, good point. I didn't notice that. Is there some formal method for > > deciding when to bump and tag a version? Or is it just a matter of tagging > > all the files at CVS HEAD when the version is bumped? > > Version increments are informal. I usually bump the minor version number in > configure.ac when I add something non-trivial that should go out to users > within reasonable time. We should tag all versions in CVS as well of course, > but it's sometimes easy to overlook.
Ok, that's what I thought. Thanks for answering. > > It's not always trivial for persons other than the one who bumps the version > number to tag releases (we might end up with inconsistencies), so please > don't. Yep, I agree. josh _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
