On 9/20/05, John Vandenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/20/05, Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 19 September 2005 22:42, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I still don't get why we want this to be run on each make invocation > > > rather than right after generating these compatibility programs? > > > > I wanted to reuse the "% : %.in" rule. > > > > > This change doesn't even stop the repeated generation of doc/quilt.1, > > > although I can't seem to figure out why. > > > > The compat-programs target was phony. > > > > Makefile.in deserves a lot of cleanups. How does the attached cleanup work > > for > > starters? > > This looks good, but I would like to get rid of the > install-compat-symlink rules. > > Could you drop hunks @@ -40,14 +40,6 @@ and @@ -308,7 +305,15 @@ ? and > I will email a patch based on top of this shortly.
Cheers, John
compat-cleanup-2.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
