On Sunday 29 January 2006 16:12, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > Quoting myself again: > > I've also noticed that bash_completion is lagging behind after all the > > recent changes that were made to several commands. I'll resync it later > > today. > > I've done so, it should be OK now. Note that I am in no way a bash > completion expert, so others are welcome to review my changes and > improve them where they can be.
Thanks! > Note that I did _not_ fully update "import" as there seemed to be some > disagreement on the recent option renaming from -n to -P. Depending on > the outcome, we may need to update bash_completion again before the > release. I don't see an advantage in using -n instead of -P (and thus reverting the -n to -p change). Does anybody think that -P as used in import vs. -P as used in other commands would confuse users? > Another note: "files" currently completes on all patches, whether they > are applied or not. The help text for the files command doesn't mention > it, but reading the code makes it clear to me that it works only on > applied patches by design. Am I correct? Yes, you are. > If I am, then we should make the help text clearer about that point, How? > and we should also update bash_completion accordingly. That would be nice. Thanks, Andreas. _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
