On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 06:36:54PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 17:53, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > We could decide that --no-intro is never interactive (--to becomes > > > > mandatory), or make it clearer at edition that only some mail headers > > > > are to be edited. > > > > > > I think Subject-Prefix should remain editable at least. > > > > Agreed > > > > > > This would mean removing the Message-Id, Date and > > > > Subject headers as well as the signature, and maybe even adding an > > > > explicit warning. > > > > > > Why are Message-Id and Date editable in the first place? > > > > No idea. I presume that you simply see all the generated headers at > > that point and you aren't actually supposed to edit these two values. > > Maybe we can make things more simple for the user by adding them after > > edition rather than before. Or maybe some people really want to tweak > > these values for whatever reason. > > No good reason, really. I just tried to not restrict users more than > necessary, while keeping the whole thing reasonably simple. > > One thing I'm unsure about is whether we really want to give up threading for > patch series without intro messages.
? My patch didn't give up threading. -- Ville Syrjälä [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
