Andreas Grünbacher <[email protected]> writes: Hi,
> Hi Arnaud, > > 2017-11-29 12:33 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Patard <[email protected]>: >> Greg KH <[email protected]> writes: >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'm using quilt to send patches. My work flow is more or less: >> >> - hack on dev box with quilt >> >> - create mbox file with quilt mail --mbox .... >> >> - copy the mail on a system which is able to send mails and send it >> >> with: >> >> formail -s /usr/lib/sendmail -odi -t < .mbox >> >> >> >> While it's working, every now and then, I'm getting some complains like: >> >> >> >> submit the patch using the kernel guidelines (not as an attachment, but >> >> in the main body text-only) > > where are those complaints coming from? > From other kernel developers. Not some kind of automated tools. >> >> Are there some steps I miss in order to not get theses complains and >> >> keep my workflow ? >> > >> > Sounds like a problem with your version of sendmail, quilt doesn't >> > create anything as an "attachment". Or are you putting headers you >> > don't mean to in the body of the changelog area? >> >> Not that I know of. For reference, one example of mbox file produced by >> quilt is https://www.rtp-net.org/misc/soc-meson-fix-ids.mbox. >> The headers don't seem to be different when I look at the mail archive >> http://archive.armlinux.org.uk/lurker/mbox/20171129.093001.24ab394b.rfc822 >> >> >> > I use quilt mail every week for the stable kernel patch review process >> > with no problems, so I kind of doubt it is a quilt problem. >> >> I know and that's why I sent a mail. Given that people are using it and >> get no complain, I may be doing something wrong but I fail to find what. > > It could be that some user agents are confused about the Content-Disposition > headers. These headers encode the filenames in the original patch queue; > when saving messages to files, some user agents will use those filenames > as hints. The headers have no other purpose, and could be removed. From the headers of the reply, the user agent we're talking of is thunderbird. I'll remove manually the Content-Disposition: line from the mbox file before sending again and see what's happening. Thanks for the hint. Thanks, Arnaud _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
