On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:53:18 -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> The first piece of this patch is erroneous.  4-5 years ago I didn't
> clearly understand the difference between "special" fonts and
> non-special fonts in *roff.  Now I do.  The u-with-umlaut character is
> "regular", or from a "text font", meaning it may have different styles
> available (bold, oblique/italic, bold-italic), unlike, say, the square
> root sign.
> 
> The correct groff request to define a fallback for a missing \[:u]
> special character escape sequence is therefore.
> 
> .fchar \\[:u] ue

Fixed, thanks.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

_______________________________________________
Quilt-dev mailing list
Quilt-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev

Reply via email to