Good point..and again I re-iterate, it could be useful for the rest of us to know of the error as well.
--- In [email protected], Keith McCombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Howard -- > One problem with using just E-mail is that if a number of people all > notice that there is a price error or a mutual fund dividend missing and > they all send an E-mail about it, then all but one of them is wasting > their time and Gary's also. > > Howard R. Hansen wrote: > > > > Keith, > > > > An interesting thought but I would rather see Quotes Plus return to the > > old method they once used to handle data errors. At one time Quotes > > Plus had a separate E-Mail address to which users were suppose to send > > questions about data and report data errors. The E-Mail address was > > some thing similar to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:data%40QuotesPlus.com>. Questions about data of > > general interest could still be discussed in this group but problems > > with the data for one issue should be sent directly to Quotes Plus. > > > > Howard > > > > Keith McCombs wrote: > > > > > > I was wondering if things might run a little smoother for both QP staff > > > and us users if there were more than one Yahoo QP forum. Perhaps adding > > > the following would help: > > > 1. quotes-plus-data: to report suspicious or missing data > > > 2. quotes-plus-dividends: to report new/missing mutual fund dividends > > > (perhaps users in the know might even report the actual distributions). > > > 3. quotes-plus-suggestions: obvious > > > > > > Then the present quotes-plus could be mostly for user questions and > > > help, staff announcements, etc. > > > -- Keith > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
