Hi

This issue is half preferred and half bond, we get 2 dividend records for it 
instead of one. Our software was never designed to handle 2 dividend records 
for one issue, that's why you only see the last information.


I'll look into changing the way we handle it. It will be a low priority.

Gary






  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: investor0329 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:27 PM
  Subject: [quotes-plus] Re: Question on ticker BGF dividends


  I know this...but...given that QP shows .21 for the divvy, partial, 
  total, otherwise, which is only half the total payment, and since 4% 
  is about 1/2 of 8%, I have to assume that the yield difference is due 
  to not all the payments being counte the last two quarters.

  --- In [email protected], George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > Not all web pages calculate the yield the same. You have to 
  determine 
  > what method they actually use to compare it with another site. Some 
  > sites quote Yield based on projected earning over the next year, 
  some 
  > base it on the last 12 months actual. If you go to the following, 
  it 
  > helps explain FAQs on yield
  > 
  > http://www.streetauthority.com/hy/faq/yields.asp
  > 
  > At 07:29 PM 1/8/2007, you wrote:
  > >Merrill Lynch shows yield of BGF to be over 8.5%..not 4%...
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >B&G FOODS INC UTS (BGF)
  > >
  > >This is real-time market data for informational purposes only. The
  > >accuracy of this data is not warranted.
  > >Date/Time 3:55 p.m.
  > >Last 19.94 (D)
  > >Change +0.09 (+0.45%)
  > >Bid (Bid Size) 19.44 (1) (P)
  > >Ask (Ask Size) 20.45 (1) (P)
  > >Previous Close 19.85
  > >Open 19.86
  > >Day Range 19.85 - 20.00
  > >52-Week Range 14.11 - 20.80
  > > Volume 57,900
  > >Last Trade Volume 100
  > >Block Trade Count 0
  > >Earnings/Share 0.59
  > >P/E 33.80
  > >Dividend/Share 1.706
  > >Dividend Yield 8.56%
  > >Beta 0.00
  > >Ex Dividend Date 12/27/2006
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >Yahoo! Groups Links
  > >
  > >
  > >
  >



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to