I happen to agree with Earl. Enough is enough. It's not so much that you might find errors, it's the kind of errors you complain about. I venture to say that extremely few QP subscribers give a rat's --- about dividend errors on thinly traded issues. Nor do they care about price errors on obscure pink sheet stocks.
You need to recognize the difference between precision and accuracy. Once more, it's hard enough to trust earnings that QP correctly reports given the myriad of tactics CFO's use even when they follow proper accounting practices. Investing or trading in stocks, ETF's or whatever is not an exact science. I venture to say the time you spend chasing these errors might better be spent on more productive work. Like money management, timing of trades/investments or just a walk in the park for fresh air. There is one other alternative you might consider; spend $1,200.00 per month to obtain data from another source. Maybe then someone there might give you a direct line to answer your questions/hold your hand. IMHO, Jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of investor0329 Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 6:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [quotes-plus] Re: Attn: investor0329 Perhaps you should check out some of your own posts..like #17215 and #17337. Often times I do send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sometimes i get a response and sometimes not...and when not, the problem is often still there...so sometimes i do both. How am i to know if their email is working or not? Gary has already stated that sometimes he doesn't get the email. If my emails bother you, ignore them. Others may find them of use and may like to know of the problems should it affect their own analysis. Gary said that some of the data inconsistencies would be fixed by end of last month. I sent an email just asking if they were (so I could proceed with some of my own analysis that requires the data be right)..but never got a response. So I assume he didn't get it. By the way..i usually sent to both the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email and to gary specifically. I don't know where the 'data' one goes. --- In [email protected], "EAdamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there anything we could do to induce you to route your incessant data > problems directly to quotes-plus support? Or limit your posts to this NG to > just one message a day? Or even better to give it a rest for a month or two? > The volume of your posts and data complaints goes far beyond a service ... > it is a nuisance. > > Earl > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > Yahoo! Groups Links
