I currently own hflax and nezyx. Both have recent distributions according to QP. Neither look like they were adjusted. That is 2 for 2. If you look at a graph of these, you can see the gapping price movement where an adjustment apparently was not made.
So..are mutual funds adjusted, or not? Is it done programmatically or by hand? Are some adjusted, and others not? This isn't the first time hflax hasn't been adjusted...as I have called it in before..and if I never did report it..would it have been fixed? There are 1000s of mutual fund tickers. If I only have 2 of them and both are not adjusted, what about all the rest? I only mention this because I build models to pick my investments. One of the things i look for is yield divided by volatility. If these are not adjusted properly..or in a timely manner, my work is a useless effort as the volatility readings I compute are all wrong. And no way will i attempt to do it by hand because when I do my search and run my models, i run it against all funds as I don't know which I will choose in advance until after i run my models. --- In [email protected], "Harry M. Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10 Feb 2007 08:41:07 -0000, "investor0329" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >>Are mutual funds prices supposed to be adjusted for distributions, > >>because as of late, they don't seem to be. Can I assume that going > >>forward, that they aren't adjusted? > > What do you mean "as of late"? I just checked about 30+ funds that I > follow. All but 5 were updated correctly for their December > distributions. For those that were not updated, it appeared they got > missed by the data supplier, so I used the Mutual Fund Editor to > manually fix them. > > Harry >
