Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > Hello List, > > First of all a happy new year to everybody! > > We're now quite happy concerning qutecom (and our kvats branding for > it). But one issue is still open (and pops up again and again from > testers): The presence is not working very well. Looks like many > functions are not properly implemented in eXosip? Do I understand it > correctly that exosip is an external library? How much effort would it > be to upgrade to a newer version? Any chance this fixes some of the > presence problems? > > In particular we're seing: > - presence is lost from time to time. We traced this to qutecom sending > a wrong presence packet, seems to be done automagically by the lib and > the contents of that packet is hardcoded there. > > - when logging in or logging off remote clients are not updated with new > presence info > - when more than one (qutecom or other) client is active simultaneously, > presence is flaky (this is the least urgent of the three). > > Ralf >
Ralf, Can you provide Wireshark captures for these issues? BTW Please submit theses bug to the tracker Thanks Vadim _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
