On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Andreas Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 03 April 2009 18:02:47 Vadim Lebedev wrote: > could you just create a source package and post it here. So we can create test > packages, see if it compiles.
+1 > I will create RPMs for openSUSE and check if x86_64 fixes are needed. I'm not > at home at the moment and have limited internet access. I'm back on Monday. Same here, I'll make Debian & Ubuntu packages. I would also suggest to reorganize the tickets *before* releasing, in particular the "milestone" field. As faar as I understand, the "milestone" field means for which version that ticket is targeted to be fixed. Once all the the tickets for that milestone have been fixed, that milestone can be release. And this can be nicely viewed in the roadmap[1] page of trac. [1] http://trac.qutecom.org/roadmap So tickets with milestone "RC2" makes no sense. So I would suggest to: -change all the open tickets either to milestone RC4 or "unset" -set trac in a way that new ticket get automatically assigned to RC4 (currently they are assigned to RC2!) -try to fix the tickets with milestone RC4 -if you decide that a ticket is not worth fixing fro RC4, unset milestone -once all tickets for RC4 are closed, release* it *i.e., as Andreas suggested: release a tarball (some kind of beta version), make sure it compiles & run, and release it as final What do you think? Cheers, Ludovico _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
