Hi Iñaki You're right the presence handling is flawed in QuteCom. Unfortunatlely we at mbdsys can't allocate resource to handle this issue right now. So if there is somebody able to implement this stuff correctly i'll gladly accept it into the tree.
BTW: here http://www.mbdsys.com/opensource/verona we have a version of phapi which correctly implements this If-Tag stuff, so it is relatively simple to port to QuteCom's version of phapi. Thanks Vadim Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to integrate Qutecom in a SIP/SIMPLE environment with a > presence server. > Unfortunatelly it's impossible to make it working since Qutecom has a > lot of bugs in the presence implementation. > don't take me wrong, but it's really fragile [1] and it implements > wrongly the specifications [2]. It has also other strange bugs related > to presence [3][4]. > > I've reported some bugs about it but haven't received input. Ok, if > you are interested I could try to contribute by describing the proper > behaviour Qutecom should implement to work in a SIP/SIMPLE > environment. I cannot code but I know the SIP specifications and I'm > used to debug SIP in lots of devices (phones, proxies...). > > Best regards. > > > [1] http://trac.qutecom.org/ticket/94 > [2] http://trac.qutecom.org/ticket/93 > [3] http://trac.qutecom.org/ticket/76 > [4] http://trac.qutecom.org/ticket/85 > > > _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
