Usually the WORD-BIGENDIAND should be defined on PPC archs....
On INTEL it shoudl not be defined


Vadim
Le 16 juin 09 à 04:28, Laurent Tarrisse a écrit :

> Hello Vadim,
>
> We've got a problem with ffmpeg. It doesn't define WORDS_BIGENDIAN  
> which
> is used in  pixfmt.h, so
>
> PIX_FMT_RGBA => PIX_FMT_BGR32
> PIX_FMT_BGRA => PIX_FMT_RGB32
>
> It explains the video color inversion ...
>
> This is a thread about :
>
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2009-January/060342.html
>
> Laurent
>
> Vadim Lebedev a écrit :
>> Why there is need to downgrade?
>>
>> Maybe we simply need to add couple of #ifdef LIBAVCODEC_VERSION <  
>> xxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vadim
>> Laurent Tarrisse wrote:
>>> You must to downgrade to ffmpeg 0.49
>>>
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>> Mathieu Osty a écrit :
>>>
>>>> No, I didn't modify this file. QuteCom compiled right away on my
>>>> system with this version of ffmpeg.
>>>> I'm going to downgrade to ffmpeg 0.5, available on macports to  
>>>> see if
>>>> it solves my problem.
>>>>
>>>> Mathieu
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Laurent Tarrisse<[email protected] 
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Have you made some changes at libs/pixertool/src/ffmpeg/ 
>>>>> pixertool-ffmpeg.c
>>>>> to build QuteCom with this ffmpeg version ?
>>>>> (if yes can you send your modification ?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Laurent
>>>>>
>>>>> Mathieu Osty a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The latest ffmpeg-devel package available on macports (svn rev  
>>>>>> 18984).
>>>>>> libavcodec v0.52.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Laurent Tarrisse<[email protected] 
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is your ffmpeg version ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laurent
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mathieu Osty a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've tried with a mac book unibody and a white mac book ?  
>>>>>>>> Same result on
>>>>>>>> both.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Laurent Tarrisse<[email protected] 
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you using a mac book unibody ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Laurent
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mathieu Osty a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well the low resolution was my mistake.
>>>>>>>>>> But the most anooying problem is the blue tint of the video  
>>>>>>>>>> decoding.
>>>>>>>>>> I guess it's related to the "palette" error.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Mathieu Osty<[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm experiencing some troubles when running h263 video  
>>>>>>>>>>> calls with the
>>>>>>>>>>> latest QuteCom source.
>>>>>>>>>>> The video quality is very poor (wrong color settings, low  
>>>>>>>>>>> resolution,
>>>>>>>>>>> low fps). It seems that the webcam driver cannot use the  
>>>>>>>>>>> iSight
>>>>>>>>>>> integrated webcam properly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the log output when running a video call:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (error) 15:16:11 [Common] void
>>>>>>>>>>> QuicktimeWebcamDriver::setupDecompressor(): can't get  
>>>>>>>>>>> channel sample
>>>>>>>>>>> description:-9407
>>>>>>>>>>> (warn) 15:16:11 [Common] virtual WebcamErrorCode
>>>>>>>>>>> QuicktimeWebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): can't set palette
>>>>>>>>>>> (info) 15:16:11 [Common] virtual WebcamErrorCode
>>>>>>>>>>> WebcamDriver::setFPS(unsigned int): WebcamDriver is  
>>>>>>>>>>> running, can't
>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>> FPS
>>>>>>>>>>> [h263p @ 0x3973200]rc buffer underflow
>>>>>>>>>>> [h263p @ 0x3973200]vbv buffer overflow
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The video quality is much better with the latest official  
>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> (v2.2
>>>>>>>>>>> RC3).
>>>>>>>>>>> Since the QuickTimeWebcamDriver didn't change for a long  
>>>>>>>>>>> time, I
>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>>>>>> the problem is coming from somewhere else...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody already encountered this kind of problem ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> QuteCom-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> QuteCom-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QuteCom-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QuteCom-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>

_______________________________________________
QuteCom-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev

Reply via email to