Vadim, I've got no contact using QuteCom. I've tested it with the "Make test call". I don't know if this is more QuteCom <=> QuteCom.
The result: Timestamp 110160000 wanted. Seeing packet with ts=10983330 t1 - t2 < 1<<31 : 99176670 < 2147483648 Timestamp 110250000 wanted. Seeing packet with ts=10990800 t1 - t2 < 1<<31 : 99259200 < 2147483648 Timestamp 110340000 wanted. Seeing packet with ts=11001060 t1 - t2 < 1<<31 : 99338940 < 2147483648 Timestamp 110430000 wanted. Seeing packet with ts=11009430 t1 - t2 < 1<<31 : 99420570 < 2147483648 Timestamp 110520000 wanted. Seeing packet with ts=11019330 t1 - t2 < 1<<31 : 99500670 < 2147483648 Wanted timestamp grows with +90000 Seen timestamp grows with about +7500 It's better than +10 to +90000, therefore t1 - t2 is growing less rapidly which means you can talk more than 30 min. About 32 min I guess. Markus Am 01.07.2009 17:44 Uhr, schrieb Vadim Lebedev: > Markus > > I undestand is that your setup is Wengophone<=> QuteCom.... > Can you test please QuteCom<=> QuteCom > > Thanks > Vadim > Markus Hossner wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> Am 30.06.2009 12:40 Uhr, schrieb Simon Morlat: >> >>> The reason for the RTP_TIMESTAMP_NEWER_THAN macro is that timestamps are >>> circular. Using won't work in all cases. Indeed 0 is newer than (2^31)+1. >>> It seems that the problem is that both timestamp don't grow identically. >>> Having a video timestamp growing by +10 is problematic. It would mean that >>> video frames are separated by 10/90000=1.1111e-04 s, so a framerate of 9000 >>> frame per second. Are you inventing a new VVHD standart (Very Very High >>> Definition) -:) ? >>> >> >> So the problem lies in the packet timestamp. It should grow like the >> wanted timestamp to prevent a difference greater than 1<< 31. >> >> >> Markus >> _______________________________________________ >> QuteCom-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
