Would it make sense to simply remove "mood" until there is some agreement on how to handle it?
QuteCom wrote: > #76: QuteCom sends too much PUBLISH > ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ > Reporter: ibc | Owner: vadim > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: QuteCom 2.2-RC4 > Component: phapi | Version: 2.2-RC3 > Resolution: | Keywords: > ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ > > Comment(by ibc): > > The second PUBLISH to indicate the "mood" (whicof course is wrong > according to SIMPLE specs) is ever worse as it always sets > "<basic>open</basic>". > > This is: > > - I change my presence status to "offline" so Qutecom generates a PUBLISH > with "<basic>close</basic>". > > - Later I change my alias/mood so Qutecom sends a PUBLISH with > "<basic>open</basic>" (and the <note> element containing the mood). > > - When any other client, '''including Qutecom''', receives the second > PUBLISH it will display the user as "online" as the <basic> field says > "online". If at least Qutecom would keep the <basic> element instead of > setting it to "open"... but well, all this stuff is really wrong :( > > _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
