Hello, Stun support (sip+rtp) need to be tested.
Laurent Le 6 juil. 2011 à 08:13, Shayan Eftekhari a écrit : > Hi, > As I understand, NAT traversal support improved in QuteCom 3.0 and now > QuteCom has STUN support in its SIP signaling and even better, ICE support in > its RTP communication. So what do you mean by "Stun support need to be > tested". Does it hold SIP, RTP, or both of them? Does it mean STUN support is > implemented and needs extra test or it is still in the development stage or > have sensitive bugs? What about ICE and TURN? > > Hello, > > Since QuteCom 2.2 things have changed with qutecom 3.0 > > Take a look at ph_nat_init() > http://trac.qutecom.org/browser/verona/phapi/phapi.c > > phcfg.nattype should be set to "auto" > phcfg.use_tunnel should be set to 0 > phcfg.stunserver should be set with an online stun sever > > This way, sip communication will use stun > About RTP streams, mediastreamer should use natively ICE (STUN+TURN) > http://trac.qutecom.org/browser/mediastreamer2/src/ice.c > Stun support need to be tested > > I'm trying to add upnp igd support to verona with http://miniupnp.free.fr/ > Sip is ok but rtp streams are not :/ > > Laurent > > Le 5 juil. 2011 à 19:34, Veljko Milisavljević a écrit : > >> Hello Laurent, >> I 've understood from threads that QuteCom is not using STUN, but there is a >> patch >> which can help. Can you send it to me? >> >> thanks >> Veljko > >
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
