for now, it is not possible :/ Le 26 janv. 2012 à 11:40, Veljko Milisavljević a écrit :
> Yes,strange, > I have tried with sip.linphone.org > and the result is the same - invites are unanswered. > Could be some particularly nasty combination of nat/firewall. > I will try again from home. > > How can I configure STUN in QuteCom ? > > Veljko > > 2012/1/26 Laurent Tarrisse <[email protected]> > 407 is an answer from server on OPTIONS packets send by QuteCom. ( this is > not a problem) > But there is no answer from server on Invite. ( I don't know why … invites > seem correct) > > Laurent > > Le 26 janv. 2012 à 10:26, Veljko Milisavljević a écrit : > >> Hi, >> I am trying with ippi.fr >> And I get 407 proxy authentication required error. >> >> Veljko >> >> >> 2012/1/26 Laurent Tarrisse <[email protected]> >> Hello Veljko, >> >> We should support STUN, UPNP, and we are working on a socks tunnel. >> Mediastreamer could use ICE. >> >> You should be able to test preview against regular Kamailio or Asterisk. >> >> Laurent >> >> Le 25 janv. 2012 à 15:34, Veljko Milisavljević a écrit : >> >>> Hello all, >>> what is the current state of NAT traversal in QuteCom 3.0 ? Which methods >>> are supported ? >>> >>> With which VoIP providers the developer's testing release can be tested? >>> http://trac.qutecom.org/downloads/Preview-QuteCom-2.99.0-win32.exe >>> >>> best regards >>> Veljko >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QuteCom-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev >> >> >> <ippi.pcap><amibehindnat.JPG> > >
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
