OK. I guess you want one of the core people to respond but in the interim can you explain the terminology "loop"? Also, do you have any prototypical applications in mind?
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I accidentally left one small change out of my previous patch. > > So... no response to my request for comments. Does that mean no one > has an opinion about whether this is a good idea or not? I'd > appreciate a response from an R core member one way or the other; if > this is not the right way to get a response, should I email people > instead? > > -- David Hinds > > > --- src/include/Internal.h.orig 2005-05-20 05:51:37.000000000 -0700 > +++ src/include/Internal.h 2005-08-22 15:46:48.968190600 -0700 > @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ > SEXP do_pushback(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > SEXP do_pushbacklength(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > SEXP do_clearpushback(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > -SEXP do_textconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > +SEXP do_loopconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > SEXP do_getallconnections(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > SEXP do_sumconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > SEXP do_download(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP); > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
