> Why guess? There are accurate statements in the R-admin manual, I read the manual 2 years ago, and the info I got was still correct.
> and the RH RPM change was discussed on this list in 2006: > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036118.html I simply do not know RPMs have been built with this option on, and there is no definite place/word I can be assured about this. > No, for the reasons given in the R-admin manual. Even the reason I gave in my first email was not up to date (most binary distributions are compiled with this option), my suggest is still valid: why not provide two binaries? Most users can use standard R without sacrificing performance and embedding applications use libR.so and, if needed, a separate binary R_embed. Cheers, Bo ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
