>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:25:58 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> At least some of this will go away if you use a current
BDR> version of 2.4.0 alpha rather than one that is a week
BDR> old (as the posting guide does ask). We are now at
BDR> r39258, and some of those binary packages were built
BDR> against a substantially later version of 2.4.0 alpha.
[............]
Still "Thank you, Rich!" for running R-alpha and your report.
We are grateful for everyone who does use R-alpha and reports
"unusual" findings, even if some of them are already known to
the R developers.
Martin
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
