>I get the same behaviour in 2.4.1 with xtable 1.4-3. Have you >perhaps updated 'xtable' as well as R and are blaming R for an >'xtable' >change? As ?print.xtable says > > From version 1.4-3, all non-numeric columns are >sanitized, and all > LaTeX special characters are sanitised for LaTeX output. See the > vignette for an example of customising the sanitization. >
Dear Prof. Ripley, many thanks for your swift reply and - as usual - you are dead right about your conclusion: I was not aware of sanitization introduced in 1.4-3 and prior to 2.5.0 I used an older version of xtable with 2.4.1, although it was not my intention to blame anybody, except myself now for not having done my homework properly - flush. Best, Bernhard >[...] > >-- >Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ >University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) >1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) >Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 > ***************************************************************** Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this mess...{{dropped}} ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel