On 22/05/2007 4:01 PM, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 3:52 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 5/22/2007 1:59 PM, Oleg Sklyar wrote: >> >> One suggestion that probably doesn't affect your package: It would be >> even nicer if R incorporated something that Duncan Temple Lang suggested >> last year, namely a new kind of quoting that didn't need escapes in the >> string. He suggested borrowing triple quotes from Python; I suggested >> something more like heredocs as in shells or Perl, or like \verb in TeX, >> in case you wanted triple quotes in your C function. It would be nice >> to settle on something, so that instead of >> > > I second that. My favorite implementation of this is in Tcl, where curly > braces {} mean that the text they enclose is unmodified. Since language > constructs using them are normally balanced this is not an impediment.
That wouldn't work in R, because the parser couldn't tell whether { a } was a block of code or a quoted string. > > One extremely useful application of this (aside from long strings) is > specifying inline data frames - I don't know how to do this otherwise. > > I.e. something like: > > A<- scan.string({# > Id Value Mark > 1 a 3 > 2 b 4 > # }) When your data doesn't contain quote marks, you can just use regular quotes to do that. I don't know of a scan.string function, but this works: A <- read.table(textConnection("# Id Value Mark 1 a 3 2 b 4 #"), head = TRUE) I think DTL's suggestion would be most useful when putting a lot of code in a string, where the escapes make the code harder to read. For example, just about any function using a complicated regular expression. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel