Sorry, I make a mistake... I meant : what the difference between setClass("myClass", representation("fatherClass",x="numeric") ....
or setClass("myClass", representation(x="numeric"), contains="fatherClass" .... > setClass("myClass", > representation(x="numeric"), > contains="fartherClass") > > seems more logical to me in sense of syntax (pay attention to setClass > instead of setMethod and contains instead of containt), but both work > apparently. > > Oleg > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi the list, > > > > There is two way to declare a new object with inheritence : one can do > > > > setMethod("myClass", > > representation("fatherClass",x="numeric") > > .... > > > > or > > > > setMethod("myClass", > > representation(x="numeric"), > > containt="fatherClass" > > .... > > > > Is there any difference ? What is the usal way ? > > > > Christophe > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > -- > Dr Oleg Sklyar * EBI-EMBL, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK * +44-1223-494466 > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel