On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is intentional.
Ok.
Please note what the R-admin manual says about
--with-lapack, including 'definitely *not* recommended'
Oh. I have always understood that as referring to --with-lapack, not
--with-lapack="-L/something...".
It applies to both.
If you are concerned about performance you definitely do not want to use
shared R, not a shared BLAS.
I'm sorry, I don't quite follow you here. Do you mean not create a shared R
and not create a shared BLAS, or was there a "not" too many?
Yes, create neither. Using shared objects has a noticeable performance
overhead.
--
Bjørn-Helge Mevik
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel