Basically the only thing in the thread that was clear
to me was Brian's phrasing.  So I'd suggest basing
any changes on that.


Patrick Burns
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")

S Ellison wrote:
Yup; you're all right - it IS consistent (and I'd even checked the x-adj
and it did what I expected!!). It's just that ?text is talking about the
position of the 'anchor' point in the text region rather than the
subsequent location of the centre of the text.

Anyway; if anyone is considering a minor tweak to ?text, would it be
clearer if it said "Values of 0, 0.5, and 1 specify text towards right/top, middle and left/bottom of x,y, respectively." ?

(or, of course, "Values of 0, 0.5, and 1 specify x,y at left/bottom,
middle and right/top of text, respectively.")

Steve Ellison
Lab of the Government Chemist
UK



*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel




______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to