Luke Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, EBo wrote:
>
> > Luke Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> >> ...
> >>> do something like the following:
> >>>
> >>> R_Expr = R_Parse1Buffer(&R_ConsoleIob, 0, &status);
> >>> if (PARSE_OK==status) {
> >>> ...
> >>> value = eval(R_CurrentExpr, rho);
> >>> ...
> >>> }
> >>
> >> We definitely do NOT want this frozen into the public API.
> >
> > What is your objection with making something like this a part of the public
> > API? I understand that having to use the IOBuffer seems a bit much, but I
> > do
> > not understand your concern.
>
> We need the freedom to completely change these internals if doing so
> proves useful.
Ah, that makes perfect sense.
Thanks,
EBo --
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
