On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote:

 -------Original Message-------
 From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not 
being excluded
 Sent: 2008-10-14 12:59

 On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote:

> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> But to the point: how often do people get DOS-style files on a
>> Unix-alike? You have to work pretty hard to do this, and there comes a
>> point at which complicating R to workaround wrongly encoded files is not
>> worth the trouble.  Let's see if anyone else reports having done this.
>>
>
> In my experience, this is a common occurrence.  Granted, foreign line
> delimiters are less common in a configuration file like .Rbuildignore, but
> they
> have been the culprit more than once in package problems I have encountered.
> think functionality like Python's universal newlines would be a big win for
> R.

 But R *does* have 'universal newlines' on its connections, and has for
 many years.


I'm suggesting that Python might be a better choice than perl for auxiliary
scripts because these details are handled under the hood.

You've completely missed the point: R would be a better choice than either.

When R was first released it was slow to start up and not good at scripting. But that's no longer true and the plan is to replace Perl scripts with R scripts. Making the developers learn an extra scripting language (Python, and a most un-R-like one at that) just to get a feature R already has would be ludicrous.


--
Nathan Coulter




 -------Original Message-------
 From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not 
being excluded
 Sent: 2008-10-14 12:59

 On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote:

> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> But to the point: how often do people get DOS-style files on a
>> Unix-alike? You have to work pretty hard to do this, and there comes a
>> point at which complicating R to workaround wrongly encoded files is not
>> worth the trouble.  Let's see if anyone else reports having done this.
>>
>
> In my experience, this is a common occurrence.  Granted, foreign line
> delimiters are less common in a configuration file like .Rbuildignore, but
> they
> have been the culprit more than once in package problems I have encountered.
> think functionality like Python's universal newlines would be a big win for
> R.

 But R *does* have 'universal newlines' on its connections, and has for
 many years.

 We are talking about a Perl script here, not R.

> One of the big draws in a programming language like Python is its claim to
> being portable, and universal newlines are a critical part of that
> functionality.  Mac-style newline delimiters are surfacing more often these
> days as well, and the best place to sort this all out would be in the
> built-in
> file manipulation functions.
> --
> Nathan Coulter
> Computer Programmer
>

 --
 Brian D. Ripley,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
 University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
 1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
 Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


--
Brian D. Ripley,                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to