This has now been fixed in R-2.9 and R-devel by Martin Maechler.

Thanks
Kasper

On Jul 13, 2009, at 15:43 , Hervé Pagès wrote:

Hi Kasper and R developers,

Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
Using the IRanges package from Bioconductor and somewhat recent R-2.9.1.
ov = IRanges(1:3, 4:6)
length(ov) # 3
seq(along = ov) # 1 2 3 as wanted
seq_along(ov) # 1!
I had expected that the last line would yield 1:3. My guess is that somehow seq_along don't utilize that ov is an S4 class with a length method.

I agree, this is not good. seq_along() has always been broken on S4
objects:

 https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-July/046337.html

so I prefer to not use it, ever. Even when I deal with S3 objects.
Because the day I need to extend my code to deal with S4 objects,
it's too easy to forget to replace 'seq_along(x)' with 'seq_len(length(x))'.
So I'd rather use the latter all the time and from the very beginning
(hopefully there is no serious performance penalty for doing this).

Surprisingly, seq_along() diserves its own C implementation (why
wouldn't seq_along <- function(x) seq_len(length(x)) be just good
enough?). It's calling length() at the C level which is an inline
function defined as:

INLINE_FUN R_len_t length(SEXP s)
{
   int i;
   switch (TYPEOF(s)) {
   case NILSXP:
       return 0;
   case LGLSXP:
   case INTSXP:
   case REALSXP:
   case CPLXSXP:
   case STRSXP:
   case CHARSXP:
   case VECSXP:
   case EXPRSXP:
   case RAWSXP:
       return LENGTH(s);
   case LISTSXP:
   case LANGSXP:
   case DOTSXP:
       i = 0;
       while (s != NULL && s != R_NilValue) {
           i++;
           s = CDR(s);
       }
       return i;
   case ENVSXP:
       return Rf_envlength(s);
   default:
       return 1;
   }
}

Hence it will return 1 when 's' is an S4SXP.

If for whatever reason, seq_along() is not able to figure out what
the *real* length of an S4 object is, then wouldn't it be better to
make it return an error? Or at least to put a big warning in its
man page saying: DON'T TRUST ME ON YOUR S4 OBJECTS, I'M BROKEN!

Cheers,
H.


The last line of the *Details* section of ?seq has a typeo. Currently it is 'seq.int', 'seq_along' and 'seq.int' are primitive: the latter two
    ignore any argument name.
I would guess it ought to be
'seq.int', 'seq_along' and 'seq_len' are primitive: the latter two
    ignore any argument name.
Kasper
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

--
Hervé Pagès

Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024

E-mail: hpa...@fhcrc.org
Phone:  (206) 667-5791
Fax:    (206) 667-1319

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to