>>>>> "YC" == Yohan Chalabi <[email protected]>
>>>>> on Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:44:13 +0200 writes:
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[email protected]>
>>>>> on Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:51:16 +0200
MM> Yes, I agree, unjustified in your case. The question
MM> is: is there a patch which does differentiate between
MM> your situation and Martin's scenario -- or does your
MM> patch already do that?
YC> Hi Martin,
YC> Thanks for your response.
YC> Here is an attempt to combine both views.
YC> To check if the generic was derived from the function it
YC> wants to overwrite, the following patch checks if the
YC> package associated with the generic is the same as the
YC> one where the function was defined.
YC> regards, Yohan
[.....]
I have now committed your proposal (+-),
and also added <R>/tests/Pkgs/ in order to allow checking such
Namespace <-> S4 and other package dependencies.
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
