>>>>> Peter Dalgaard writes: > Petr Savicky wrote: >> For the package at >> http://www.cs.cas.cz/~savicky/R-devel/something_0.0.0.tar.gz >> which is a minor part of some other package only to demonstrate the >> problem, i get (under R version 2.11.0 Under development 2009-12-12 r50714 >> and also under R-2.9.2, openSUSE 11.1 (x86_64) and CentOS release 5.2) >> >> R CMD check something_0.0.0.tar.gz >> >> ... >> * checking Rd files ... OK >> * checking Rd metadata ... OK >> * checking Rd cross-references ... OK >> * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK >> * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK >> * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK >> * checking examples ... NONE >> * checking PDF version of manual ... OK >> >> although the package code contains >> >> testCoreNA <- function() >> >> and the documentation contains >> >> \usage{ >> testCoreClass(verbose=0) >> testCoreAttrEval(verbose=0) >> testCoreReg(verbose=0) >> testCoreNA(verbose=0) >> } >> >> There is a mismatch between code and documentation of testCoreNA(). Is the >> problem caused by having four entries in \usage{} section?
> Hmm, looks more like a thinko in this code inside codoc(): > functions_in_code <- Filter(function(f) { > f <- get(f, envir = code_env) > is.function(f) && (length(formals(f)) > 0L) > }, objects_in_code) > which, further down the line, causes functions with no formal arguments > to be skipped when compared to the usage section. > Browse[2]> > debug: ind <- (!functions %in% functions_to_be_ignored & functions %in% > functions_in_code) > Browse[2]> functions > [1] "testCoreClass" "testCoreAttrEval" "testCoreReg" > "testCoreNA" > Browse[2]> > debug: bad_functions <- mapply(functions[ind], exprs[ind], FUN = > function(x, > y) check_codoc(x, as.pairlist(as.alist.call(y[-1L]))), SIMPLIFY = > FALSE) > Browse[2]> ind > [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE > I.e. testCoreNA is never tested by check_codoc. There may of course be > a rationale for this, but it escapes me... Well, I am sure I had good reasons when I wrote the code many years ago, but of course I no longer recall what they were. Did you try the effect of removing the length(formals(f)) test? -k > -- > O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B > c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K > (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 > ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalga...@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel