How about using: Enhances: Rmpi
? b On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Ross Boylan <r...@biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote: > I have a package that can use rmpi, but works fine without it. None of > the automatic test code invokes rmpi functionality. (One test file > illustrates how to use it, but has quit() as its first command.) > > What's the best way to handle this? In particular, what is the > appropriate form for upload to CRAN? > > When I omitted rmpi from the DESCRITPION file R CMD check gave > <quote> > * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE > alldone: no visible global function definition for ‘mpi.bcast.Robj’ > alldone: no visible global function definition for ‘mpi.exit’ > <quote> > followed by many more warnings. > > When I add > Suggests: Rmpi > in DESCRIPTION the check stops if the package is not installed: > <quote> > * checking package dependencies ... ERROR > Packages required but not available: > Rmpi > </quote> > Rmpi is not required, but I gather from previous discussion on this list > that suggests basically means required for R CMD check. > > NAMESPACE seems to raise similar issues; I don't see any mechanism for > optional imports. Also, I have not used namespaces, and am not eager to > destabilize things so close to release. At least, I hope I'm close to > release :) > > Thanks for any advice. > > Ross Boylan > > P.S. Thanks, Duncan, for your recent advice on my help format problem > with R 2.7. I removed the nested \description, and now things look OK. > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel