On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Henrik Bengtsson <h...@stat.berkeley.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I found in a bit of code the following test for infinity: > > if (x == Inf) ... > > Is that valid, or should it be (as I always thought): > > if (is.infinite(x)) ...? > > Does it depend on whether 'x' is float or integer? > > My question is related to testing for missing values where is.na(x) is > required.
Well, '-Inf' is infinite too: > is.infinite(-Inf) [1] TRUE but is not equal to Inf: > Inf == -Inf [1] FALSE Also, ?is.infinite says it is a generic method, so is.infinite(x) could be doing anything, depending on x. I would say the best way of testing if x is a numeric value of plus infinity would be to test x==Inf. Also also, is.infinite (on a numeric vector) returns FALSE on NA, and NaN, whereas x==Inf returns NA values for non nice-number inputs. Barry -- blog: http://geospaced.blogspot.com/ web: http://www.maths.lancs.ac.uk/~rowlings web: http://www.rowlingson.com/ twitter: http://twitter.com/geospacedman pics: http://www.flickr.com/photos/spacedman ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel