On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 14/12/2010 10:52 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>
>> Both of my questions were not clear, sorry.
>>
>> What I really want to do is have a customized version of Sweave.sty
>> (Sweave++.sty)
>> included automatically from some designated area, like the include
>> directory
>> of another
>> package, rather than requiring the user to keep a version in the local
>> directory. Since
>> the changes are minor, it might make more sense to solve this by
>> incorporating
>> them into Sweave.sty.
>>
>
> I don't know a way to refer to package directories from a Sweave document.
> It might be possible to write an R function that writes out
> system-dependent \usepackage{} commands, and put that in a results=tex code
> chunk. However, I'm not certain LaTeX can handle Windows paths in general
> (spaces and tildes both seem to cause problems, and I don't know a way to
> avoid both), so this might be impossible.
>
>
> On the temp directory, yes, I'm talking about Sweave's prefix option. Your
>> suggestion
>> to use dir.create() sounds like a reasonable work-around for the fact that
>> TeX cannot perform OS-level functions.
>>
>
> The directory needs to be in place by the time you write out a figure or
> concordance from Sweave, so TeX can't be involved in creating it.
>
>
> Yet another small issue that I'm sure others have encountered is that
>> TeX processing will fail under Linux when the source files contain DOS
>> CR's,
>> and
>> the error diagnostics would leave you in the dark. The only fix that I
>> could
>> come up with is to remove the CR's manually using tr. Is there a better
>> way?
>>
>
> I think it is most productive to think of the .tex output from Sweave as
> system-dependent object files, not portable source. I'm pretty sure Sweave
> can read CR/LF files on any system and will write out local line endings.
> So it's only a problem when you distribute the .tex output of Sweave, not
> when you distribute the .Rnw input. (I understand there are circumstances
> where this is unavoidable, but you shouldn't be surprised when object files
> aren't portable.)
Here is a small clarification, related to Romain's original post about
highlight. The highlight program (used by Romain't highlight package
the last time I looked) generates .tex files from source files (either R or
C++ source), and if the original .R or .cpp file
contains DOS CR's, so will the generated .tex file, and TeX will choke
(under Linux). Thus in this sense even source files are
system-dependent.
>
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> Thanks,
>> Dominick
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > On 14/12/2010 9:54 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>> >
>> >> Another question about Sweave (actually it is more a question
>> >> about TeX). Is there a reliable (system-independent) way to
>> >> use Sweave.sty without having to place it in the current working
>> >> directory? MiKTeX under Windows has dropped the use of
>> >> TEXINPUTS, and this complicates the problem.
>> >>
>> >
>> > If you run it from R, the right path will be put in place. The
>> > tools::texi2dvi function does this.
>> >
>> >
>> > Furthermore, you cannot refer to Sweave.sty using its full path
>> >> as this would obviously not be system-independent.
>> >>
>> >> Yet another small issue: If I configure Sweave to use a
>> >> temp directory for its temp files, and if this temp directory
>> >> does not exist, TeX fails with error diagnostics that is not
>> >> clear at all. Is there a way to have TeX automatically
>> >> create the directory if necessary?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I don't understand this one. Are you talking about a "prefix=somedir/"
>> > option to Sweave? That needs to be there before TeX is run. I
>> sometimes
>> > put a dir.create("somedir", showWarnings=FALSE) call in an early chunk
>> in
>> > the document to create it.
>> >
>> > Duncan Murdoch
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >> Dominick
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Friedrich Leisch<
>> >> friedrich.lei...@stat.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > >>>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:40:04 +0100,
>> >> > >>>>> Romain Francois (RF) wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Hello,
>> >> > > Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver
>> >> argument, and
>> >> > > several packages take advantage of that and define custom
>> Sweave
>> >> driver
>> >> > > for various purposes. Most of them are listed on the
>> Reproducible
>> >> > > Research CTV:
>> >> > > (
>> http://cran.r-project.org/web/views/ReproducibleResearch.html)
>> >> >
>> >> > > The next natural step is for package developpers to take
>> advantage
>> >> of
>> >> > > this in their vignettes. In Rcpp we work around the way
>> package
>> >> building
>> >> > > works and we do:
>> >> > > - let R build a dummy vignette
>> >> > > - then use the inst/doc/Makefile to replace it with a
>> vignette that
>> >> is
>> >> > > processed by the driver from the highlight package (giving
>> syntax
>> >> > > highlighting).
>> >> >
>> >> > > I played with Sweave so that it would be able to create the
>> driver
>> >> from
>> >> > > some text included in the text of the .Rnw file:
>> >> >
>> >> > > $ svn diff
>> >> > > Index: src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R
>> >> > >
>> ===================================================================
>> >> > > --- src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R (revision 53846)
>> >> > > +++ src/library/utils/R/Sweave.R (working copy)
>> >> > > @@ -20,6 +20,16 @@
>> >> > > # We don't need srclines for code, but we do need it for
>> text,
>> >> and
>> >> > > it's easiest
>> >> > > # to just keep it for everything.
>> >> >
>> >> > > +SweaveGetDriver<- function(file){
>> >> > > + txt<- readLines(file)
>> >> > > + line<- grep( "\\SweaveDriver", txt, value = TRUE )
>> >> > > + if( length(line) ){
>> >> > > + txt<- sub( "^.*\\SweaveDriver[{](.*)[}]", "\\1",
>> line[1L]
>> >> )
>> >> > > + driver<- try( eval( parse( text = txt ) ), silent =
>> TRUE )
>> >> > > + if( !inherits( driver, "try-error") ) driver
>> >> > > + }
>> >> > > +}
>> >> > > +
>> >> > > Sweave<- function(file, driver=RweaveLatex(),
>> >> > > syntax=getOption("SweaveSyntax"), ...)
>> >> > > {
>> >> > > @@ -28,7 +38,9 @@
>> >> > > else if(is.function(driver))
>> >> > > driver<- driver()
>> >> >
>> >> > > -
>> >> > > + drv<- SweaveGetDriver(file)
>> >> > > + if( !is.null(drv) ) driver<- drv
>> >> > > +
>> >> > > if(is.null(syntax))
>> >> > > syntax<- SweaveGetSyntax(file)
>> >> > > if(is.character(syntax))
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > This allows one to write something like this in their file:
>> >> >
>> >> > > %\SweaveDriver{ { require(highlight); HighlightWeaveLatex() }
>> }
>> >> >
>> >> > > So that when calling :
>> >> >
>> >> > >> Sweave( "somefile.Rnw" )
>> >> >
>> >> > > the highlight driver is used instead of the default driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > > Could something like that be added to Sweave ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, sure!
>> >> >
>> >> > Will have a look at the patch later this week and apply it if it
>> >> > passes the tests. The patch is against a current r-devel?
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > Fritz
>> >> >
>> >> > ______________________________________________
>> >> > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________________________
>> >> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
