Two things have emerged in testing on x86_64 Fedora 14 which mean that a recent R-patched is probably needed.

1) That OS uses zlib 1.2.5: that claims to be binary-compatible with zlib 1.2.3 but is not, as we found (painfully) on Windows. The remedy was to remap _all_ the symbols in R's own copy of zlib (not just those zlib arranged to remap).

The symptoms were crashes using packages XML and rgoobi (both of which link to zlib) and incorrect results in RJaCGH (which contains a copy of zlib). There may well be other problems ....

2) Fedora 14 uses gcc 4.5.1. With CFLAGS containing the default -O2 or higher, HAVE_C99_COMPLEX was detected as false because there is a (genuine) incompatibility between types Rcomplex and C99's double complex. This means that R's fallback code is used, and regretably that contains a serious bug in an 'optimization' by a colleague, so z^n is incorrect for most complex z and integer n (and has been since 2.10.0). The remedy is to use R-patched or R-devel, or only optimize to -O.

We've also seen incorrect results from package mvtnorm when C optimization was -O3.

The upshot is that there is likely to be a 2.12.2 to fix these issues.

--
Brian D. Ripley,                  rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to