Look at ?ReferenceClasses for this OOP paradigm in R, which is quite different from the functional paradigm of S4 methods.

On 4/6/11 7:54 AM, A Zege wrote:
Apologies for asking something that is probably very obvious, i just started
with S4 classes and i guess i am not finding documentation that lays out the
grammar rules and gives enough examples.

I understand that main method of writing a member function is to write a
generic function and setMethod for this particular class. This, however,
presumes that there is "virtuality" for this function, i.e. it could be used
with other inherited classes . Truth is, many, if not most of my functions
don't have virtuality in mind. I want to write them inside classes to
achieve incapsulaton only -- use class member data without passing it as
parameters or making global to a bunch of functions and have some specific
class member functions that don't pollute a global namespace and can be
called only for a particular class. This is what enclosured do in R. Is
there some obvious way of setting this environment local to a class and
without writing generic functions that i am missing?


Would appreciate any pointers


--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/S4-generic-functions-methods-vs-enclosures-tp3430950p3430950.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to