hopefully you'll be able to create a reproducible example, as my hanging 
issues seem to come and go without any obvious reason.


On 17/08/2011 13:50, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
> I'll see if I can put together a self-contained example.  Primarily, 
> the times that I use multicore (and attempted to use doSMP, mostly 
> because one of my users refuses to ditch Windows) are when I am 
> reading a ton of binary files, none of which depend on the others. 
>  This is a blindingly obvious use-case for e.g. doMC and doSMP, yet 
> what typically happens is that the entire operation wedges.  I'm told 
> that doSMP really only works well with Revolution R, but per above, I 
> will try to put together a working self-contained example to show how.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Renaud Gaujoux <ren...@cbio.uct.ac.za 
> <mailto:ren...@cbio.uct.ac.za>> wrote:
>
>     I did notice some strange behaviour once, but things were working
>     without a problem for a while now.
>     foreach loops and concepts are nice concepts, which I'd like to
>     carry on using.
>     Maybe somebody from the foreach-dopar packages could explain why
>     they have such issues?
>
>     Tim do you have concrete examples of the issues you talked with
>     other developers?
>
>     Thank you.
>
>     Renaud
>
>     On 17/08/2011 12:45, Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
>>     yes -- doMC (and doSMP) are kind of bogus and I just use
>>     multicore::mclapply() to good effect these days.  I checked
>>     around with other people doing similar things at the Bioconductor
>>     developer day and pretty much everyone confirmed that doWHATEVER
>>     seems to have issues, where as multicore itself... doesn't.
>>
>>     Just my $0.02,
>>
>>     --t
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Renaud Gaujoux
>>     <ren...@mancala.cbio.uct.ac.za
>>     <mailto:ren...@mancala.cbio.uct.ac.za>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         in R 2.12.1, R CMD check hangs when building a vignette that
>>         uses a foreach loop with the doMC parallel backend.
>>         This does not happen in R 2.13.1, nor if I use doSEQ instead
>>         of doMC.
>>         All versions of multicore, doMC and foreach are the same on
>>         both my R installations.
>>
>>         Has anybody encountered a similar issue?
>>
>>         Thank you.
>>         Renaud
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ###
>>         UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
>>         This e-mail is subject to the UCT ICT policies and
>>         e-mai...{{dropped:5}}
>>
>>         ______________________________________________
>>         R-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-devel@r-project.org> mailing list
>>         https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>
>>             If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it
>>             is only because they do not realize how complicated life is.
>>
>>     John von Neumann
>>     
>> <http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/%7Ehistory/Biographies/Von_Neumann.html>
>>
>
>     ###
>
>     UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
>
>     This e-mail is subject to the UCT ICT policies and e-mail
>     disclaimer published on our website at
>     http://www.uct.ac.za/about/policies/emaildisclaimer/ or obtainable
>     from +27 21 650 9111 <tel:%2B27%2021%20650%209111>. This e-mail is
>     intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If the
>     e-mail has reached you in error, please notify the author. If you
>     are not the intended recipient of the e-mail you may not use,
>     disclose, copy, redirect or print the content. If this e-mail is
>     not related to the business of UCT it is sent by the sender in the
>     sender's individual capacity.
>
>     ###
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> When you emerge in a few years, you can ask someone what you missed, 
> and you'll find it can be summed up in a few minutes.
>
> Derek Sivers <http://sivers.org/berklee>
>

 

###
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN 

This e-mail is subject to the UCT ICT policies and e-mai...{{dropped:9}}

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to